|
Other than maybe comedy and horror, comedy and action is the best genre mashup around. Those two styles just complement each other incredibly well, so naturally, I’ve been super excited for the new action comedy Novocaine ever since I first heard about it. The premise alone was enough to pique my interest, but what really sent my anticipation through the roof was the trailer. This film looked like it would blend its two genres nearly to perfection, so when I got the chance to attend an early screening at my local AMC, I couldn’t say no. I eagerly purchased a ticket as soon as I got home from work, and now that I’ve finally seen the movie, I’m happy to report that it totally delivers.
Novocaine was directed by Dan Berk and Robert Olsen, and it stars Jack Quaid, Amber Midthunder, Ray Nicholson, Jacob Batalon, Betty Gabriel, and Matt Walsh. In the film, Nathan is an unassuming bank manager with a rare medical condition called congenital insensitivity to pain, or CIP for short. As the name suggests, it means the guy can’t feel pain, so he leads a very careful life. He has to make sure he doesn’t unknowingly injure himself, and for him, that means eschewing any sort of social life. When he’s not working, he just stays home playing video games, but that all changes when he has lunch with Sherry. She’s one of the tellers at the bank, and they hit it off immediately. Sherry becomes Nathan’s first real friend, and soon after that, she becomes his girlfriend. It seems like life has finally turned around for our poor protagonist, but before he can really savor this newfound happiness, something terrible happens. One day, a group of criminals rob the bank and take Sherry hostage, and without thinking twice, Nathan decides to take matters into his own hands. He follows the thieves in hopes of rescuing the woman he loves, and as luck would have it, his insensitivity to pain comes very much in handy. Like a lot of the best action flicks, Novocaine doesn’t dive into the mayhem right away. It spends about twenty-five minutes introducing us to the two main characters and their budding relationship, and if you ask me, that’s the exact right storytelling choice. Nathan and Sherry are both incredibly likable, so no matter what’s happening, it’s just an absolute joy to see them on screen. Let’s start with Nathan. He’s played by Jack Quaid, and if you’ve ever seen The Boys, you know exactly what this guy is like. He has the same dorky, somewhat awkward personality as Hughie, Quaid’s character in that show, and to the surprise of nobody, Quaid knocks it out of the park. He’s so natural in these roles you can’t help but wonder if he’s like that in real life, and just like in The Boys, he also manages to imbue Nathan with the kind of charisma that keeps your eyes glued to the screen whenever he’s around. He’s simply a super fun character to watch, but he’s not the only great protagonist in the first act of Novocaine. Sherry doesn’t have any noteworthy quirks, but that doesn’t stop actress Amber Midthunder from shining just as brightly as her costar. She takes what could’ve very easily been a bland love interest and turns her into the kind of person you’d love to hang out with, so Nathan and Sherry just might be the year’s best on-screen couple so far (at the very least, they give Ally and Jay from Heart Eyes a run for their money). That great lead duo carries the first twenty-five minutes of Novocaine, but their influence doesn’t stop there. They also keep the rest of the movie grounded in genuine humanity, so when the action finally kicks into gear, it’s not just visual noise. You truly care about Nathan and Sherry’s plight, and that emotional connection with the characters makes this more than just an action flick. It’s a love story. It’s about the lengths a man will go to in order to protect the woman he loves, and to quote Inigo Montoya in The Princess Bride, “you could not ask for a more noble cause than that.” That being said, a great cause is only half the battle. The main character’s pursuit of his goal also has to be entertaining, and on that count, Novocaine is a total slam dunk as well. The action is super fun, but the real star of this show is the comedy. Nathan’s inability to feel pain is played for laughs from beginning to end, so no matter what happens to him, the directing team of Dan Berk and Robert Olsen manage to turn it into a genuinely knee-slapping joke. On paper, that schtick might sound like it would get old pretty quickly, but the directors don’t let that happen. They constantly find new and inventive ways to make you laugh out loud, and it’s a good thing they do, because Nathan’s injuries get pretty intense at times. To take just a couple of examples, there’s a scene where the guy gets an arrow shot through his leg, and at one point in the film, he even gets some of his fingernails ripped off. If this wasn’t a comedy, those moments would feel like they came straight out of a gross-out horror flick, but with the gags, they end up being surprisingly lighthearted. To be fair, the jokes don’t neutralize all of Nathan’s injuries, so the more squeamish among us will probably still struggle with some of them, but on the whole, they’ll make the experience of watching someone endure grievous bodily harm way more enjoyable than you’d ever expect it to be. It’s an absolute blast and a half, so if you’re a fan of bonkers action comedies, I think you’re going to love Novocaine. It’s not the best movie of this still-young year (as of this writing, that honor goes to a little Italian film called There’s Still Tomorrow), but it’s definitely the most fun, and it grounds that fun in genuine humanity. I walked out of the theater with a big smile on my face, and if this sounds like something you’d enjoy, I think you will too.
0 Comments
I first heard about The Rule of Jenny Pen when the film was making its rounds on the festival circuit last year, and I’ve been dying to see it ever since. The premise sounded super intriguing, the movie features one of my favorite actors of all time, and to top it all off, Stephen King, arguably the biggest name in the horror genre today, gave the film his stamp of approval. That trifecta was more than enough to earn The Rule of Jenny Pen a spot near the top of my most-anticipated list, so I bought a ticket for opening weekend as soon as I got the chance. I couldn’t wait to find out if this movie lived up to the hype, and now that I’ve finally seen it for myself, I’m sad to report that it’s a huge disappointment.
The Rule of Jenny Pen was directed and co-written by James Ashcroft, and it stars John Lithgow and Geoffrey Rush. In the film, Stefan Mortensen is an elderly judge who enters a nursing home after suffering a stroke in the courtroom, and soon after he arrives, he realizes something isn’t quite right with the place. One of the residents, a man named Dave Crealy, terrorizes his neighbors, but somehow, the home’s staff are completely oblivious to this guy’s mean streak. He puts on a facade of elderly senility whenever they’re around, but when they’re not watching, Dave turns into an absolute monster. As you can probably guess, he eventually sets his sights on the home’s newest patient, and since the staff won’t do anything about it, Stefan decides to take matters into his own hands. I ended up not liking The Rule of Jenny Pen, but that doesn’t mean the whole movie was terrible. I actually quite enjoyed the first thirty minutes or so, and that was largely due to the two lead stars. Let’s begin with Geoffrey Rush. He plays Stefan, and he’s fantastic. His character is extremely bitter about his deteriorating condition, and he takes it out on the people around him. At his best, the man is merely apathetically aloof, but at his worst, he’s verbally abusive. Geoffrey Rush completely sells the poor guy’s plight and his less-than-noble attitude about it, so you almost can’t help but have mixed feelings about him. Sure, Stefan isn’t exactly a likable protagonist, but you can’t really blame him for his less savory qualities. He’s lost a lot of his independence, and he probably feels like he’s lost much of his dignity as well, so you totally understand why he’s lashing out. In fact, in the midst of everything The Rule of Jenny Pen does poorly, the best thing about this film just might be its unflinching examination of the abasement and humiliation the elderly often experience. For instance, when Stefan gets bathed, you can see the shame and dejection in his face, and when he tries to report Dave for the man’s horrific behavior, the staff pretty much just ignore him and assume he’s going senile. Those are only a couple of examples, but The Rule of Jenny Pen features a number of similarly heartbreaking moments. The movie can be a bit tough to watch at times, but it’s important that we see the indignities the elderly have to face. We can’t treat them with the love and respect they deserve if we don’t understand their struggles, and this film does a fairly good job of shedding light on the crosses they’re often forced to bear. Getting back to the lead performances, John Lithgow plays Dave, and he’s not given quite as much to do as his costar. As I said earlier, his character feigns senility much of the time, so Lithgow doesn’t always have to show off his world-class acting chops. But don’t worry, there are plenty of times when the script calls for him to be more than just a decrepit old man, and when it does, he’s excellent. He pulls off mysteriously creepy and full-on psycho with equal aplomb, so he turns many of his scenes into genuine nightmares. Granted, the score and the camerawork do their fair share as well, but Lithgow’s performance takes the early horror in The Rule of Jenny Pen to another level. He makes it an incredibly atmospheric slow burn that will have you dying to know what this guy’s deal is, so for about the first thirty minutes or so of this movie, I was totally on board. But as the story wore on, my patience began to wear thin. Dave’s odious antics eventually make him feel more like a high school bully than a legit horror villain, so after a while, I just couldn’t take him seriously anymore. I kept waiting for him to reveal a larger plan or a darker force behind his actions, but that moment never came. This guy is nothing more than an eighty-year-old schoolyard menace, and there are even a few scenes where he asks his victims “Who rules?” and forces them to say “Jenny Pen” and lick the back of his wrist. See, Jenny Pen is a hand puppet he constantly wears, and the back of his wrist is supposed to be the puppet’s backside. It’s an incredibly juvenile way of showing his dominance over his neighbors, so every time Dave did this, I couldn’t help but think of the famous Billy Madison line “O’Doyle rules!” I don’t know about you, but I don’t find the idea of a nursing home bully very interesting, so as much as I love Stephen King, I have to disagree with him on this one. Sure, The Rule of Jenny Pen starts strong, but the film quickly runs its promising premise straight into the ground. It ends up being a huge nothingburger, so unless you absolutely have to see this movie for yourself, I strongly suggest giving it a pass. I’ve been looking forward to Mickey 17 for a while. In fact, it became one of my most anticipated upcoming films even before I knew what it was about. When I learned the movie was being made by Bong Joon Ho, the man behind the 2019 hit Parasite, I immediately put it on my must-watch list. This guy has been making amazing genre films for over two decades (if you’ve only seen Parasite, I highly recommend checking out his other work; you won’t be disappointed), so I’ll watch anything he does. I couldn’t wait to see this darkly comedic sci-fi adventure, and now that I finally have, I’m happy to report that it does not disappoint.
Mickey 17 was written and directed by Bong Joon Ho, and it stars Robert Pattinson, Naomi Ackie, Steven Yeun, Toni Collette, and Mark Ruffalo. In the film, the titular Mickey is in a unique line of work. His job is to die. Repeatedly. See, in this world, humanity has perfected its cloning technology, so if someone’s desperate enough, they can become an expendable. These are people, like Mickey, whose job is to be experimented on and perform jobs so dangerous they’re essentially suicide missions, and every time they die, their employer simply prints them a new body, complete with their memories and personality. But one day, something goes wrong. Mickey’s seventeenth iteration (hence the name Mickey 17) doesn’t die like he’s supposed to, so when the company creates another clone, they end up with two Mickeys simultaneously. This is a big taboo, so Mickey 17 has to keep his existence a secret for as long as possible. But of course, that’s easier said than done. He doesn’t stay in the shadows for long, and soon enough, the two Mickeys find themselves at the center of a potentially catastrophic encounter between humanity and an otherworldly species that can only be described as giant roly-polies. Like any movie, Mickey 17 relies heavily on the strength of its characters, and to be honest, they’re a bit of a mixed bag. Let’s start with the negatives. The primary antagonist of this film is Kenneth Marshall, a conniving, evil politician who hides his dastardly plans behind a hypocritical facade of Christian faith, and he’s about as flat as they come. If you close your eyes and just listen to his dialogue, you’d almost certainly picture him twirling his mustache every time he opens his mouth, and to make matters worse, actor Mark Ruffalo plays the part like a bad Donald Trump impersonation. He even purses his lips when he speaks, so if you enjoy overly on-the-nose political commentary, you’re going to love this guy. But if you’re like me and you prefer it when filmmakers at least try to be a bit subtle, this character is just going to make you roll your eyes every time he’s on screen. Along similar lines, Marshall’s wife, Ylfa, is just as one-dimensional and over the top as her husband, so the two make for one of the most uninteresting villain duos I’ve seen in a while. There’s just nothing to these characters beyond their propensity for evil, so if you ask me, they feel more like walking plot points than real, flesh-and-blood human beings. It’s a huge character misstep that essentially lays the weight of this story entirely on the good guys’ shoulders, and in a lot of movies, that would be fatal. But not here. Mickey 17 manages to avoid that pitfall, and the film’s biggest saving grace is Robert Pattinson’s amazing dual performance. He plays all the Mickey variants, but of course, Mickeys 17 and 18 are the stars of the show. Interestingly, most of these characters are very similar, almost indistinguishable in fact, but when Mickey 18 comes on the scene, he’s different. The movie doesn’t explain why, so if you’re looking for pinpoint logical precision, that minor plot hole is probably going to bother you. But if you can forgive slight transgressions like that, you’ll realize it’s actually for the best. By making these two versions of Mickey so different, Pattinson gets to show off his incredible range as an actor, and it’s an absolute joy to behold. The titular Mickey 17 is a timid, weak, somewhat awkward fellow, but Mickey 18 carries himself with a confident, almost arrogant bad-boy swagger. Everything about these characters, from the way they talk to their facial expressions and even the way they stand, is different, so if you didn’t know any better, you’d never think they were two versions of the same person. It’s a bit reminiscent of James McAvoy’s performances in Split and Glass, but by focusing on only two personalities, Pattinson is able to explore them in greater depth. That impressive display of acting dexterity just about carries Mickey 17, but it’s not the only thing this film has going for it. The rest of the cast is pretty good too (aside from the villains, of course), and the dark humor adds a really nice touch that keeps the story’s weighty themes from becoming too oppressive. As you can probably guess from the premise, this movie deals with death and the natural human fear of dying, so without the jokes, the experience would become very drab very quickly. But thankfully, it never does, so these heavy ideas go down much more smoothly than you might expect. On top of that, the overall message of Mickey 17 is also quite admirable. I can’t talk about it too much without giving away some key plot points, but suffice it to say that this film ultimately highlights the inalienable value of every human being. The story’s cloning technology naturally raises questions about personal identity and the possibility of overcoming death with science, but that’s little more than philosophical window dressing. Sure, those are interesting ideas to explore, but at its core, the seemingly endless succession of Mickey clones is an allegory for the ways our world (and especially those in power) often treats human life as expendable. All too often, people like Kenneth Marshall and his wife only care about advancing their own goals and interests, and they show absolutely no concern for the pain and destruction they leave in their wake. As long as it benefits them, they have no qualms about hurting or even killing those they consider expendable, and this story makes the ugliness of that attitude impossible to miss. It’s a message all people of good will can get behind, and when you combine it with Robert Pattinson’s amazing dual performance and the fun comedy, you get a great time at the theater. To be fair, the weak villains keep this movie from being one of Bong Joon Ho’s best, but a mid-tier entry in this guy’s filmography is still enough to earn a hearty thumbs up from me. |
Jp Nunezis a longtime film buff and theology nerd with master's degrees in theology and philosophy from Franciscan University of Steubenville. His favorite movie genres are horror, superheroes, and giant monsters. Archives
April 2025
Categories |
RSS Feed